Article Text

PDF
Prognostic value of early response assessment using (18F)FDG-PET in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors
  1. Jun Ma1,
  2. Xiaojing Wu2,
  3. Jianghong Li1,
  4. Zhihua Wang1,
  5. Yi Wang1
  1. 1Department of Thoracic surgery, Heji Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, China
  2. 2Department of Respiratory Medicine, Heji Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, China
  1. Correspondence to Dr Yi Wang, Department of Thoracic surgery, Heji Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi 046000, China; wangyi{at}sinamca.com

Abstract

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the prognostic value of early response assessment using (18F)fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission thermography (PET) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs). MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched until August 1, 2016 using the keywords non-small cell lung carcinoma, positron-emission tomography, fluorodeoxyglucose, prognosis, disease progression, survival, erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib. Inclusion criteria were studies of patients with stage III or IV NSCLC treated with a TKI and had response assessed by FDG-PET. Outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Of the 167 articles identified, 10 studies including 302 patients were included in the analysis. In 8 studies, patients were treated with erlotinib, and in 2 they were treated with gefitinib. The overall analysis revealed that early metabolic response was statistically associated with improved OS (HR=0.54; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.63; p<0.001), and with longer PFS (HR=0.23; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.33; p<0.001). Early response of patients with NSCLC treated with TKIs identified on FDG-PET is associated with improved OS and PFS.

  • Cancer

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • JM and XW are the co-firstauthors.

  • Contributors JM was involved in manuscript editing and statistical analysis. XW was involved in literature research and data acquisition. JL was involved in study concepts and definition of intellectual content. ZW was involved in manuscript preparation. YW was involved in study design and manuscript review.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.